These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic mechanisms of intravenous N-acetylprocainamide in patients with ventricular dysrhythmias. Author: Sung RJ, Juma Z, Saksena S. Journal: Am Heart J; 1983 May; 105(5):811-9. PubMed ID: 6189384. Abstract: To define electrophysiologic properties and antiarrhythmic mechanisms of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), we studied 16 patients with symptomatic ventricular dysrhythmias. Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of NAPA at 20 mg/kg over 20 minutes, achieving plasma concentrations of 24 +/- 3.2 to 35.5 +/- 4.5 micrograms/ml. NAPA did not significantly change sinus cycle length or atrioventricular (AV) conduction times (PA, AH, HV, and QRS), but it lengthened the QTc interval (p less than 0.001) during sinus rhythm. Programmed atrial stimulation revealed that NAPA had no discernible effects on AV nodal conduction; however, it exerted depressive effects on the His-Purkinje system in 9 of 16 patients. In 7 of 16 patients who manifested frequent ventricular premature beats (VPBs), NAPA abolished VPBs in only three of them; NAPA induced progressive prolongation of the premature coupling interval before complete abolition of VPBs. In 8 of 16 patients who had inducible repetitive ventricular response (RVR) because of reentry within the His-Purkinje system, NAPA narrowed or abolished the RVR zone in 3 patients and slowed the RVR rate with widening of the RVR zone in the remaining 5 patients. In 2 of 16 patients with slow ventricular tachycardia (VT), NAPA had no antiarrhythmic effects. By contrast, in the other 2 of 16 patients in whom sustained VT could be reproducibly elicited with programmed ventricular stimulation, NAPA slowed the rate of VT and suppressed VT inducibility. We conclude that electrophysiologic properties of NAPA are slightly different from those of procainamide and that NAPA is not uniformly effective for suppressing ventricular dysrhythmias, but its antiarrhythmic mechanisms are similar to those of procainamide.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]