These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Significance of repetitive ventricular extrasystoles in the acute phase of myocardial infarction].
    Author: Juillard A, Bouajina A, Fréchon B, Gay J, Barrillon A, Gerbaux A.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Feb; 77(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 6201148.
    Abstract:
    Ventricular extrasystoles were analysed by a computerised monitor in 144 patients during the first three days of myocardial infarction. The patients had been hospitalised within 6 hours (77% of cases) and within 12 hours (92% of cases) of onset of symptoms. The patients were divided into 4 groups: Group A (46 cases) without repetitive ventricular extrasystoles; Group B (37 cases) with repetitive ventricular extrasystoles but without frequent isolated extrasystoles; Group C (25 patients) with repetitive ventricular extrasystoles and frequent isolated extrasystoles but without polymorphism or R on T phenomenon; and Group D (36 patients) with repetitive extrasystoles, frequent isolated polymorphic extrasystoles and/or R on T phenomenon. The size of infarction, as judged by peak CPK values, was smaller in Group A than in the other groups but was not significantly different in Groups B, C and D. The incidence of cardiac failure was comparable in Groups A and B and in Groups C and D, and was higher in the latter two groups than in A and B. The cardiothoracic ratio on admission was increased more often in Group D than in the other groups. Therefore, repetitive ventricular extrasystoles are the result of large infarcts. Their association with frequent isolated ventricular extrasystoles is a sign of insufficiency of the remaining myocardium. Patients with pre-existing poor myocardial function develop polymorphism and R on T phenomenon, signs which are associated with a particularly poor prognosis (hospital mortality: 42%). On the other hand, patients in Group B appeared to have satisfactory myocardial function despite the size of their infarcts, and the mortality, nil in this group, was less than in patients without arrhythmias.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]