These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of amiodarone on electric induction, morphology, and rate of ventricular tachycardia and its relation to clinical efficacy.
    Author: Reddy CP, Kuo CS, Jivrajka V.
    Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Nov; 7(6 Pt 1):1055-62. PubMed ID: 6209624.
    Abstract:
    Using His bundle electrograms and programmed ventricular stimulation, the effects of chronic amiodarone treatment on induction, morphology, and the rate of ventricular tachycardia (VT) were studied in 17 consecutive patients treated with amiodarone for control of recurrent sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation. Studies were done before and after treatment with amiodarone for an average duration of 5.3 (range 2 to 18) months. During the control study, sustained VT could be induced in 16 patients. VT was initiated by single or double right ventricular (RV) extrastimuli in 14 patients, by double left ventricular (LV) extrastimuli in 1 patient, and by RV burst pacing in 1 patient. Only one pattern (morphology) of VT similar to that of spontaneous VT was induced in 12 patients and two patterns of VT in 4 patients. The average cycle length (CL) (mean +/- SD) of induced VT was 325.8 +/- 61.2 ms. After amiodarone, VT could be induced in 7 of 17 patients and was initiated by single RV extrastimuli in 5 patients, double RV extrastimuli in 1 patient, and RV burst pacing in 1 patient. In 3 of 5 patients in whom VT could be initiated by single RV extrastimuli, initiation of VT required double RV or double LV extrastimuli in the control study; in 1 of 5 patients VT could not be induced in the control study. Amiodarone induced nonclinical, polymorphic VT in 4 patients in whom only clinical VT could be induced during the control study. Compared to control, the CL of induced VT was significantly longer (322 +/- 65.7 vs 416 +/- 41.5 ms; P less than 0.001).+
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]