These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Errors in the primary x-ray diagnosis of maxillofacial fractures.
    Author: Moilanen A.
    Journal: Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 6215296.
    Abstract:
    The accuracy in reading of primary maxillo-facial films of 347 inpatients with facial fractures was analysed retrospectively. In all, patients had 438 fractures: 116 nasal, 167 mandibular, 133 mid-facial and 22 upper facial fractures. 68% of all patients were operated. A correct diagnosis in the accident department was made in 322 out of 438 fractures (74%) by a radiologist and in 294 (70%) by a non-radiologist. The accuracy in interpretation of nasal and mandibular fractures was good by both interpreters, but less satisfactory in the assessment of mid-facial fractures. A false diagnosis was made in 23% of cases by a radiologist and in 24% by a non-radiologist, a partially correct diagnosis in 32% and in 42% of cases, respectively. Poor radiographic technique and lack of experience for facial trauma diagnostics from a radiological aspect were the most important sources of error. In general hospitals, special training in the interpretation of maxillo-facial radiograms should be organized.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]