These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coronary vascular reserve in left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to chronic aortic regurgitation.
    Author: Pichard AD, Smith H, Holt J, Meller J, Gorlin R.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan 15; 51(2):315-20. PubMed ID: 6218741.
    Abstract:
    Coronary vascular reserve was studied in 11 patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Nineteen patients with the chest pain syndrome and normal findings on cardiac catheterization served as control subjects. Resting coronary sinus flow and contrast-agent-induced hyperemia were measured by continuous thermodilution. Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and mass were obtained echocardiographically. All patients had normal coronary arteries. Resting coronary flow was increased and coronary reserve was decreased in patients with AR compared with the control subjects: 310 +/- 38 versus 121 +/- 13 ml/min and 56 +/- 9 versus 86 +/- 7.5%, respectively. The decrease in coronary vascular reserve correlated with the increase in LV mass (r = -0.86, p = 0.001) and LV wall thickness (r = -0.83, p = 0.002) and with the decrease in LV volume/mass ratio (r = 0.761, p = 0.007). There was no significant correlation between the decrease in coronary vascular reserve and LV volume (r = 0.255), LV peak wall stress (r = 0.292), LV systolic pressure (r = -0.495), aortic or LV diastolic pressure (r = 0.322 and -0.318, respectively), or aortic-LV diastolic gradient, nor with the voltage on the electrocardiogram (limb leads r = -0.60, precordial leads r = -0.118). Thus, coronary vascular reserve is decreased in proportion to the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with chronic AR. Patients with angina pectoris tended to have a lower coronary vascular reserve than those without angina (median 26 versus 76%, difference not significant). LV wall thickness and not LV volume is the critical component of left ventricular mass related to coronary reserve. No significant correlation between the decrease in coronary vascular reserve and the presence of angina pectoris was demonstrated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]