These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A study of variability in cytologic diagnoses based on pulmonary aspiration specimens.
    Author: Taft PD, Szyfelbein WM, Greene R.
    Journal: Am J Clin Pathol; 1980 Jan; 73(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 6243442.
    Abstract:
    Reproducibility of cytologic diagnoses of malignancy and accuracy and variability of diagnoses of malignant cell types were assessed in a study of pulmonary aspirates from 100 patients. Original cytologic diagnoses were positive for 60 of the 80 patients who had malignancy (true-positive rate 75%). No false-positive diagnosis was made. Original cytologic diagnoses were negative for 15 of the remaining 20 patients (true-negative rate 75%). In "blindly" reviewing the slides, the pathologist who had made the original diagnoses (Observer A) and another pathologist (Observer B) confirmed the 60 original positive diagnoses. Observer A added four cases, Observer B 11 cases to the positive category. Cell types of original positive cytologic diagnoses and those of subsequent histologic diagnoses agreed for 23 of 33 malignancies (70%). Although two observers increased the proportion of positive cytologic diagnoses, the percentages of agreement with respect to histologic malignant cell types remained similar. For cytologic specimens, intraobserver agreement as to malignant cell types was 83% (50 of 60); interobserver agreement was 80% (48 of 60).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]