These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin with third generation cephalosporins and ureido penicillins against multiple resistant Serratia marcescens.
    Author: Miller MA, LeFrock JL, Vercler MJ.
    Journal: Microbiol Immunol; 1981; 25(11):1119-27. PubMed ID: 6276701.
    Abstract:
    Twenty multiple resistant clinical isolates were tested with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, and the three ureidopenicillins: azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin. A concentration of less than 0.97 microgram/ml inhibited 100% of organisms for N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime, 90% for moxalactam, and 60% for cefoperazone. An increase in inoculum from 10(3) to 10(6) cells reduced activity fourfold for 95% of isolates with cefoperazone, 70% with N-formimidoyl thienamycin, 65% for cefotaxime, but only 15% for moxalactam. For ureidopenicillins, 85% of strains tested had MIC's less than or equal to 15.6 micrograms/ml. An inoculum effect was observed in only 35-50%. At 10(3), the cidal concentration was the same or twofold greater than the inhibitory level for N-f-thienamycin and cephalosporins in 70% of strains tested and 65% for penicillins. With 10(6), the 70% value remained for N-f-thienamycin but was reduced to 45% for cefotaxime and 25% for moxalactam; 85% demonstrated greater than eightfold differences with cefoperazone. Single step high-level resistance was observed to moxalactam (20%). Carbenicillin resistant strains were cross-resistant to the ureidopenicillins. N-f-thienamycin and cefotaxime appeared comparable, although important differences between morphological alteration and metabolism may influence their therapeutic effectiveness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]