These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differential cardiovascular effects of calcium channel blocking agents: potential mechanisms.
    Author: Millard RW, Lathrop DA, Grupp G, Ashraf M, Grupp IL, Schwartz A.
    Journal: Am J Cardiol; 1982 Feb 18; 49(3):499-506. PubMed ID: 6277175.
    Abstract:
    The three major calcium channel blocking agents, diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil, inhibit calcium entry into excitable cells. Despite this apparent common action at the cell membrane, these drugs produce quantitative and frequently qualitative differences in cardiovascular variables (for example, heart rate, atrioventricular [A-V] conduction and myocardial inotropic state) when evaluated at equieffective vasodilator doses. All three drugs increase coronary blood flow in a dose-dependent fashion (nifedipine greater than diltiazem = verapamil), and produce a negative inotropic effect in vitro in isolated atria and ventricles, also in a dose-dependent manner (verapamil greater than nifedipine greater than diltiazem). However, in conscious dogs nifedipine increases, verapamil decreases and diltiazem has little effect on the inotropic state. A-V conduction is slowed by diltiazem and verapamil but not by nifedipine in anesthetized dogs and in conscious dogs as judged from the P-R interval in the electrocardiogram. Heart rate is slowed in pentobarbital-anesthetized animals but is accelerated in conscious dogs (nifedipine greater than verapamil greater than diltiazem). Nifedipine also appears to interfere significantly with the arterial baroreceptor reflex by an apparent vagolytic action that is less evident with diltiazem and verapamil. Diltiazem, and possibly verapamil and nifedipine as well, appears to retard myocardial damage that accompanies ischemia. The mechanisms and sites of action of these drugs are presumed to be at the cell membrane; however, intracellular sites may also be involved.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]