These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differentiation between bronchodilation and universal adenosine antagonism among xanthine derivatives.
    Author: Persson CG, Karlsson JA, Erjefält I.
    Journal: Life Sci; 1982 Jun 21; 30(25):2181-9. PubMed ID: 6287142.
    Abstract:
    Relaxant effects and adenosine-antagonism of 3-propyl-xanthine (enprofylline) and 10 different methyl-xanthines were examined in isolated guinea-pig tracheas. The chemical structural requirements for tracheal relaxation were found to be different from those for adenosine antagonism by the xanthine derivatives. All xanthines produced relaxation: Enprofylline was about 5 times more potent than theophylline. However, only xanthines with a methyl in the 1-position consistently antagonized the relaxant effect of adenosine. --Theophylline over a wide range of concentrations (30-900 microM) produced a concentration dependent and surmountable antagonism at nervous adenosine receptors (isolated guinea-pig myenteric-plexus preparations). The same concentrations of enprofylline were almost devoid of antagonism at these adenosine receptors. In mice theophylline (6-24 mg/kg given intraperitoneally) dose-dependently increased locomotor activity while enprofylline (2-48 mg/Kg) was without effect on behaviour. "Non-blocking" xanthines such as enprofylline may be potent bronchodilators but lack many theophylline-like actions. We, therefore, forward the hypothesis that universal adenosine antagonism is both unnecessary and undesirable with xanthine antiasthmatics.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]