These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Segmental flexibility and head-head interaction in scallop myosin. A study using saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Author: Wells C, Bagshaw CR.
    Journal: J Mol Biol; 1983 Feb 15; 164(1):137-57. PubMed ID: 6302270.
    Abstract:
    Saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to investigate the rotational motion of the head domains of native and desensitized scallop myosin and its proteolytic subfragments. Scallop myosin was spin-labelled with 4-(2-iodoacetamido)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinooxyl, which reacted with a heavy chain residue in the subfragment 1 domain. As previously shown for rabbit skeletal muscle myosin (Thomas et al., 1975), the two head domains of native scallop myosin appear to have independent motion (rotational correlation time, pi, = 0.8 X 10(-7) s for subfragment 1; 1.4 X 10(-7) s for myosin). However, removal of a regulatory light chain, to effect desensitization of the actin-activated ATPase, was associated with an increase in pi for myosin to a value of 2.4 X 10(-6) s. The Ca2+ sensitivity and initial correlation time were restored on recombination of the regulatory light chain in the presence of Mg2+. Sedimentation velocity profiles in an analytical ultracentrifuge indicated that the desensitized myosin preparations were largely monomeric and therefore the change in pi appears to reflect an intramolecular event. Addition of EDTA to spin-labelled scallop heavy meromyosin caused an immediate 2.5 to 4-fold increase in pi and a partial desensitization of the ATPase activity. Comparable experiments with subfragment 1 yielded a barely detectable increase in pi (1.5-fold) in the first ten minutes. The restricted rotational motion observed in desensitized myosin and heavy meromyosin could arise by a conformational change in the subfragment 1-subfragment 2 hinge region or by an association of one head with its partner. The latter mechanism, involving the exposed light chain binding site, would also explain the preferential release of one regulatory light chain from scallop myosin, and might account for some other co-operative effects observed in this molecule (Bagshaw, 1980).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]