These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Malignant potential of homozygous and heterozygous complete moles.
    Author: Wake N, Seki T, Fujita H, Okubo H, Sakai K, Okuyama K, Hayashi H, Shiina Y, Sato H, Kuroda M.
    Journal: Cancer Res; 1984 Mar; 44(3):1226-30. PubMed ID: 6318983.
    Abstract:
    There are two main mechanisms of origin for complete hydatidiform mole: (a) fertilization of an empty egg by a haploid sperm followed by duplication (monospermic mole); and (b) fertilization of such an egg by two haploid spermatozoa (dispermic mole). The former is inevitably homozygous (homozygous mole), whereas the latter may be heterozygous for a given genetic marker (heterozygous mole). A recent cytogenetic study showed that three cases of choriocarcinoma were undoubtedly heterozygous, which prompted us to compare the incidence of postmolar sequelae between patients with homozygous moles and those with heterozygous moles. Making use of chromosomal heteromorphisms and human lymphocyte antigen and phosphoglucuromutase 1 polymorphisms, we established the androgenetic origin of a complete mole in 49 of 56 cases. Homozygosity was confirmed in 21 moles, and heterozygosity was confirmed in five. Three of five patients with heterozygous moles developed postmolar trophoblastic disease, whereas none of the 21 patients with homozygous moles suffered postmolar trophoblastic disease except one who showed signs of degenerating residual trophoblasts. Consistent with this observation is the fact that all of the four destructive moles studied here were of dispermic origin. Thus, heterozygous moles seem to have a higher malignant potential than do homozygous moles.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]