These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Disparate cardiovascular effects of obesity and arterial hypertension.
    Author: Messerli FH, Sundgaard-Riise K, Reisin E, Dreslinski G, Dunn FG, Frohlich E.
    Journal: Am J Med; 1983 May; 74(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 6340494.
    Abstract:
    Since obesity and essential hypertension frequently coexist, a study was designed to analyze some of their cardiovascular effects. Twenty-eight obese patients, half of whom were normotensive and half with established hypertension, were matched for mean arterial pressure with 28 corresponding lean subjects. Systemic and renal hemodynamics, intravascular volume, plasma renin activity, and circulating catecholamine levels were measured. Obese patients had increased cardiac output (p less than 0.001), stroke volume (p less than 0.001), central blood volume (p less than 0.02), plasma and total blood volume (p less than 0.01), and decreased total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.001). In contrast, cardiac output, central blood volume, and stroke volume of hypertensive patients were normal, but they had increased total peripheral (p less than 0.001) and renal vascular resistance (p less than 0.001) and a contracted intravascular volume. Left ventricular stroke work was elevated to a similar level in obesity (p less than 0.001) and hypertension (p less than 0.02), but the increase was caused by an expanded stroke volume in the former and by an increase in systolic pressure in the latter. It is concluded that the disparate effects of obesity and hypertension on total peripheral resistance and intravascular volume counteract and may even offset each other. Thus, obesity may mitigate the effects of chronically elevated total peripheral resistance (and therefore end-organ damage) in essential hypertension. Since both entities affect the heart through different mechanisms, their presence in the same patient results in a double burden to the left ventricle, thereby gently enhancing the long-term risk of congestive failure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]