These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evoked potentials. With special reference to the diagnostic value in multiple sclerosis.
    Author: Kjaer M.
    Journal: Acta Neurol Scand; 1983 Feb; 67(2):67-89. PubMed ID: 6342329.
    Abstract:
    A survey is given of my studies of evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in control subjects. Potentials were recorded following random low-rate auditory stimulation (BAEP), checker-board pattern-reversal stimulation (VEP), somatosensory stimulation (SEP); blink reflexes (BR) were recorded following electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve. Normal data had to be related to age and sex in evaluating BAEPs and VEPs. In 160 MS patients, a total of 421 recordings were obtained. Changes by repeated BAEP and VEP tests might reflect changes in the clinical state, but they also did occur in clinically stable patients. In patients with definite MS, high incidences of abnormality were shown, supporting the clinical findings. The diagnostic value was greatest when clinically silent lesions were demonstrated in patients with suspected or possible MS. In these patients, either BAEP or VEP gave evidence of subclinical lesions in about 50%, and when combined, in 71% of the patients, thus making a transfer to a more certain diagnostic classification possible and invasive examinations unnecessary. When SEP and BR tests were added, subclinical lesions were found in 74% of the patients. The SEP recordings did show a high incidence of abnormality, but only few silent lesions; the BR test was the least sensitive. The VEP was abnormal in all patients with signs of optic neuritis and in all but one with a history of optic neuritis. The present results are compared to those obtained in other laboratories and with other types of examinations in MS patients. It is concluded that although the tests are not specific for MS, they give valuable information in the majority of patients with a clinically uncertain diagnosis. This information will most often not be given by other types of examination. The combination of VEP and BAEP is recommended, but it should be supplemented by SEP recording in patients without spinal signs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]