These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Comparative study of various methods for the determination of the IgM or IgG class of antibodies, applied to the diagnosis of hepatitis A]. Author: Dupressoir-Burlet MV, Maniez-Montreuil M. Journal: Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1983 Apr; 26(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 6348923. Abstract: We report herein results of comparative study of different methods for determination of M or G classes of antibodies applied to serodiagnosis of type A hepatitis. We have examined retrospectively 259 sera with a technique employing protein A and 2 kits, HAVAB-M (RIA-M) and Hepanostika anti-HAV-IgM (ELISA-M). Some sera were studied after treatment by 2-mercapto-ethanol. We have obtained the same results with RIA-M and ELISA-M: 119 sera contain Ac anti-HAV of M class and 116 of G class, 24 sera non classified with protein A owing to their low level of Ac anti-HAV, are all but one of G class. We have observed 23 discrepancies between protein A or RIA-M and ELISA-M. A first group is constituted by 15 sera obtained during late convalescence and containing rates of Ac anti-HAV-M too low to be determined with protein A or 2-mercapto-ethanol so they are classified G, while RIA-M and ELISA-M, more sensitive, could detect such antibodies. Another group is constituted by 8 sera containing low rates of anti-HAV antibodies so we could not dilute them for reaction, and IgG were not adsorbed entirely on protein A while 2-mercapto-ethanol, RIA-M and ELISA-M led them being classified Ac anti-HAV-G. RIA-M and ELISA-M are useful tools particularly for sera obtained during late convalescence while protein A and 2-mercapto-ethanol are effective for diagnosis during 1 month after acute phase.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]