These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: An experimental evaluation of central vs. peripheral injection for intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA). Author: Rubin DL, Burbank FH, Bradley BR, Brody WR. Journal: Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 6368460. Abstract: At a given radiation dosage and field of view, five variables are under meaningful control for intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA): concentration and quantity of contrast media injected, volume of injectate, rate of injection, and site of injection. Some controversy exists regarding the selection of a central vs. a peripheral injection site for IV-DSA. This study determined the influence of the site of injection on the peak and width of the arterial time-concentration curve produced by contrast media. Using a noninvasive, in vivo, quantitative x-ray measurement method, 36 separate injections (10 ml of ioxaglate at 8 ml/sec) were administered into the cephalic vein, subclavian vein, and main pulmonary artery in dogs. Injection sites were varied using a Latin-square experimental design. Cardiac output, central blood volume and the peak and width of the contrast media time-concentration curves were measured. The average peak enhancement was greatest for the pulmonary artery injection site. Normalizing peak and width values to make the pulmonary artery values 100%, the average peak values for injections into the subclavian vein and cephalic vein were 93% and 56%, and the average widths were 141% and 163%, respectively. These data support the use of a more central injection site for optimizing IV-DSA examinations.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]