These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The protective action of glutathione on the microbial mutagenicity of the Z- and E-isomers of 1,3-dichloropropene.
    Author: Creedy CL, Brooks TM, Dean BJ, Hutson DH, Wright AS.
    Journal: Chem Biol Interact; 1984 Jun; 50(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 6375881.
    Abstract:
    The Z(cis)- and E(trans)-isomers of 1,3-dichloropropene (DCP), in confirmation of previous reports, caused dose-dependent increases in the numbers of reverse mutations in Salmonella typhimurium TA100 in the presence and absence of a 9000 X g supernatant fraction (S9) from the livers of Aroclor-treated rats. The relevance of these findings to mammals is uncertain, not least because of major differences in the metabolism of the DCPs in the microbial assay systems and in vivo. For example, (Z)-DCP is efficiently detoxified in mammals by the operation of a glutathione (GSH)-dependent S-alkyl transferase. It is possible that such detoxification could proceed only very slowly in the microbial assays because the concentrations of GSH could be severely rate-limiting even in those assays fortified by the addition of S9. The results obtained in the current study demonstrate a dramatic reduction in the microbial mutagenicity of both (Z)- and (E)-DCP when the concentration of GSH in the microbial assays was adjusted to a normal physiological concentration (5 mM). However, this protective action of GSH was at least as effective in the absence of S9 as in its presence, suggesting that it was not mediated by mammalian GSH transferase. There appears to be little or no GSH alkyl or aryl transferase in the cytosol of S. typhimurium TA100, but intracellular GSH is present at a concentration similar to that found in mammalian cells. Since the uncatalysed reaction between the DCPs and glutathione is relatively slow, the effect is not due simply to their destruction by GSH. It is possible that a physiological concentration of extracellular GSH maintains the intracellular GSH in a reduced form in which its nucleophilic thiol group competes effectively with the nucleophilic centres in the bacterial DNA for the haloalkenes. The current results highlight the efficiency of GSH-linked systems in affording protection against the genotoxic action of the DCPs. It may be presumed that their operation would exert a major limiting effect on the genotoxicity of (Z)- and (E)-DCP in mammals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]