These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Technic of rectum anastomoses in rectum resection. A controlled study: instrumental suture versus hand suture].
    Author: Thiede A, Schubert G, Poser HL, Jostarndt L.
    Journal: Chirurg; 1984 May; 55(5):326-35. PubMed ID: 6375991.
    Abstract:
    Stapler and manual sutures in rectal end-to-end anastomoses were compared in a controlled trial. The following results were obtained: For the analysis the cases naturally separated into three groups, A (manual suture), B (planned stapler suture) and WD ("withdrawn" cases, from both groups, in which continence could be maintained only with a stapler suture). The distribution of the WD cases in dependence on localization and sex varied significantly from groups A and B, while A and B remained comparable, in spite of the WD cases. The analysis of the date showed no, or only slight, clinical differences. In a comparison of the two stapler groups B and WD, significantly more suture dehiscences, colocutaneous fistulae and post-operative disturbances in bladder function were found in group WD. As a general conclusion we can state that: In comparable anastomosis localizations it is possible to achieve almost the same clinical results with both suture techniques. With a circular stapler it is, however, technically possible to perform rectum resections in cases in which this was not previously possible, particularly in men with a narrow pelvis and a stale pelvic floor. To what extent this still is an advantage after the local recurrences are taken into consideration remains to be seen.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]