These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
    Author: Fraser AG, Culling W, Singh H, Ruttley MS, Newcombe RG.
    Journal: Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137.
    Abstract:
    We compared the haemodynamic effects of a low osmolality contrast medium Hexabrix 320 (meglumine/sodium ioxaglate) with a high osmolality medium Urografin 370 (meglumine/sodium diatrizoate) in 32 patients. Each underwent left ventriculography with both media, which caused similar small and transient increases in heart rate and systolic pressure. In 15 patients with coronary artery disease, the mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased by 4 mmHg after hexabrix compared with 10 mmHg after urografin (P less than 0.01); it returned to normal more quickly after hexabrix. Changes after both media did not correlate with baseline end-diastolic pressure, ejection fraction, or extent of coronary artery disease, and thus left ventriculography was unhelpful as a stress test. In 14 patients with mitral stenosis, hexabrix produced a smaller increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (P less than 0.001), left atrial pressure (P less than 0.01) and mitral valve gradient (P less than 0.05) than urografin. Patients preferred the low osmolality medium (P less than 0.01). There was no difference in angiographic quality. We advocate low osmolality contrast media for patients with poor left ventricular function or severe mitral stenosis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]