These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Computed tomography and echography in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma].
    Author: Brailski Kh, Petkov D, Mendizova A, Glavnicheva I, Mitova R.
    Journal: Vutr Boles; 1984; 23(6):17-21. PubMed ID: 6397913.
    Abstract:
    The diagnostic possibilities of computer tomography and echographic investigations were studied in 58 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 36 patients with carcinoma of pancreas. Positive morphological signs for the existence of chronic pancreatitis were established in 75,9 per cent in computer tomography and in 83,93 per cent in echographic investigations. The difference in the diagnostic sensitivity of both diagnostic methods is not significant (p greater than 0,05). The calcifications in pancreas are better detected by computer tomography whereas both methods are equivalent in the diagnosis of the pancreatic cystes. In carcinoma of pancreas computer tomography gives the correct diagnosis of the disease (p greater than 0,05) in 69,5 per cent and echography--in 78,8 per cent of the patients. With computer tomography false negative results amount to 30,5%; in 13,9 per cent normal pancreas was described and in 16 per cent--pseudocyst in pancreas. With echography--false negative results were established in 21,2 per cent of the patients; 12,1 per cent chronic pancreatitis was described, in 9,1 per cent--pseudocyst in pancreas but, at the same time, pancreas was not properly visualized in 8,3 per cent of the examined. Making use of both methods, accurate diagnosis was made in 83,3 per cent of the patients with carcinoma of pancreas.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]