These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical swabs using the Gonozyme enzyme immunoassay. Clinical evaluation in a university family planning clinic.
    Author: Nachamkin I, Sondheimer SJ, Barbagallo S, Barth S.
    Journal: Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Oct; 82(4):461-5. PubMed ID: 6433697.
    Abstract:
    The authors performed a prospective clinical evaluation of the Gonozyme (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) assay in a family planning clinic population. One thousand five hundred eighty-eight female patients were screened for gonococcal infection using culture and Gonozyme assay. One hundred nine patients were culture positive (6.9% disease prevalence). The sensitivity and specificity of the Gonozyme assay in this setting was 87.2% and 89.1%, respectively. The predictive value of a positive and negative test, given a disease prevalence of 6.9%, was 37.2% and 98.9%, respectively. The false-positive and false-negative rate was 10.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The authors prospectively followed patients with true-positive and false-positive Gonozyme results. The Gonozyme test showed a 83% correlation with test of cure cultures and, thus, should not be used for test cure analysis. False-positive Gonozyme tests could not be explained on the basis of cross-reacting bacteria or detection of vancomycin-sensitive gonococci. The authors' results suggest that the Gonozyme test should not be used in lieu of culture in a clinical setting with a similar population. The authors performed a prospective, clinical evaluation of the Gonozyme assay in a family planning clinic population. 1588 female patients were screened for gonococcal infection using culture and Gonozyme assay. 109 patients were culture positive (6.9% disease prevalence). The sensitivity and specificity of the Gonozyme assay in this setting was 87.2% and 89.1% respectively. The predictive value of a positive and negative test, given a disease prevalence of 6.9%, was 37.2% and 98.9%, respectively. The false positive and false negative rate was 10.9% and 12.8% respectively. The authors prospectively followed patients with true positive and false positive Gonozyme results. The Gonozyme test showed an 83% correlation with test of cure cultures and, thus, should not be used for test of cure analysis. False positive Gonozyme tests could not be explained on the basis of cross-reacting bacteria or detection of vancomycin sensitive gonococci. Results suggest that the Gonozyme test should not be used in lieu of culture in a clinical setting with a similar population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]