These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Moxalactam - a beta-lactam antibiotic in the monotherapy of severe infections in surgery. Clinico-bacteriological study of 35 patients]. Author: Gonzenbach HR, Sonnabend W. Journal: Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1981 Aug 04; 111(31-32):1169-83. PubMed ID: 6456543. Abstract: Moxalactam, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, was given to 35 patients at the Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gall. The trial period started in April 1980 and ended in October. Moxalactam was not combined with any other antibiotic. The clinical course was observed closely and extensive bacteriological, mycological, and pharmacokinetic studies were carried out to evaluate the new antibiotic. Most of the patients had an intra-abdominal infectious disease and primary treatment was surgery. The antibiotic therapy was started at surgery. A total of 290 different bacteria could be isolated from the 35 patients. 220 isolates were aerobic and 7 0 anaerobic. The minimal inhibitory concentration was calculated for every isolate. In addition, the serum levels of moxalactam was determined in almost every patient. In 31 patients (88.6%) the therapy was successful, in 2 patients no evaluation was possible and in 2 patients the therapy was unsuccessful, including one patient with a primarily moxalactam-resistant Bacteroides fragilis responsible for sepsis. In some patients a massive increase in Candida was noted in the urine, stool, or wound drainage. Primarily moxalactam-resistant organisms, such as Streptococcus faecalis, were often found alone in the samples taken later in the course of therapy. An extraordinary change in the fecal flora could be observed during therapy, but no clinical complications resulted. No specific antifungal therapy nor any additional antibiotic against Streptococcus faecalis was necessary. Moxalactam was well tolerated and side effects were minimal. No impairment of renal function was noticed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]