These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diastolic myocardial stiffness in gradually developing left ventricular hypertrophy in dog.
    Author: Serizawa T, Mirsky I, Carabello BA, Grossman W.
    Journal: Am J Physiol; 1982 Apr; 242(4):H633-7. PubMed ID: 6461261.
    Abstract:
    The effects of gradually developing left ventricular pressure overload on diastolic myocardial stiffness were studied in a chronic moderate hypertrophy model. A snug aortic band was placed beneath the left coronary artery in six puppies 4.5 wk of age, and hemodynamic studies were performed 33.5 wk later. In all six dogs, moderate pressure gradients (10-58 mmHg) developed across the constriction, and angiographic area of the aortic constriction was significantly smaller than for a control group, 4.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.4 +/- 0.8 mm2/kg, (mean +/- SE, P less than 0.05). Increases occurred in left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (1.08 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.83 +/- 0.04 cm, P less than 0.05), LV wall mass (5.2 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.2 g/kg, P less than 0.05), and wall thickness-to-radius ratio (0.67 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.03, P less than 0.01), whereas no differences were noted in LV end-diastolic pressure (11 +/- 1 vs. 9 +/- 1 mmHg), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV, 2.06 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.35 +/- 0.15 ml/kg) or ejection fraction (71 +/- 4 vs. 71 +/- 3%). The values of LV wall mass, LVEDV, and aortic constriction are normalized to body weight. Diastolic LV myocardial stiffness was examined in terms of the elastic stiffness-stress relations. There were small and insignificant differences in end-diastolic stress (17.3 +/- 1.5 vs. 20.4 +/- 3.8 g/cm2), myocardial stiffness constant (Km, 13.7 +/- 5.6 vs. 11.2 +/- 3.3), and end-diastolic elastic stiffness (221 +/- 67 vs. 221 +/- 79 g/cm2) between hypertrophied and control hearts. No significant differences in the elastic stiffness of hypertrophied and normal muscle were observed over the common stress range of 5-25 g/cm2. We conclude that moderate left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic, gradually developing pressure overload is an adaptation process associated with normal myocardial stiffness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]