These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Diagnostic value of echocardiographic examinations in the evaluation of patients with infectious endocarditis of aortic and/or mitral valve localization].
    Author: Enia F, Bella R, Celona G, Filippone V, Lo Mauro R, Lombardo E, Carmina G, Matassa C, Geraci E.
    Journal: G Ital Cardiol; 1984 Jul; 14(7):479-91. PubMed ID: 6489659.
    Abstract:
    We estimated sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and efficiency of echocardiography in detecting vegetations and ruptured valves in patients with aortic and/or mitral valves infective endocarditis. We studied two groups of patients, in whom both high quality echocardiography examination and surgical inspection of heart valves were available. Group I: 16 patients (32 valves) with aortic and/or mitral valves endocarditis and surgical demonstration of vegetations and/or ruptured valves. In this group the prevalence of vegetations was 65.6%, the prevalence of ruptured valves was 43.7%. Group II was composed of the 16 patients of group I with endocarditis and of 93 other patients without endocarditis. In this group (139 valves) the prevalence of vegetations was 15%, the prevalence of ruptured valves was 13.6%. Echocardiographic detection of valve vegetations. Sensitivity (71.4%) was the same in group I and II. Specificity was 91% in group I and 91.5% in group II. The positive predictive value was 93.7% in group I and 60% in group II. The negative predictive value was 62.5% and 94.7% respectively. Echocardiographic detection of ruptured valves: sensitivity was 50% in I and 42% in group II. Specificity was 94.4% in group I and 99% in group II. The positive predictive value was 87.5% in group I and 89% in group II. The negative predictive value was 70.8% in group I and 91.5% in group II. The echocardiographic efficiency was higher in group II: 88.4% for vegetations and 91.3% for ruptured valves. This reflects the high specificity and the high definition of normal valves in this unselected low-risk group. The efficiency was lower in group I: 78% for vegetations and 75% for ruptured valves. This reflects the poor sensitivity and the failure of the test to identify all the vegetations or the ruptured valves in this selected high-risk group.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]