These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix].
    Author: Matsuyama T, Tsukamoto N, Kashimura M, Iwasaka T, Saito T, Uchino H, Nakano H, Matsukuma K.
    Journal: Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325.
    Abstract:
    Therapeutic efficacy of cervical conization was examined on 93 patients with borderline lesions of the uterine cervix who underwent hysterectomy following conization. No lesions or only minimal residual lesions were found at subsequent hysterectomy when the surgical margins of cone specimens were not involved in the malignant or premalignant lesions. From these results, we concluded that cervical conization could be considered as a therapeutic procedure when the following conditions were fulfilled. Cone specimens are sufficient in size. Both endocervical and exocervical margins are negative. No malignancy is found on endocervical curettage. No abnormal cytologic findings are found after conization. Another follow-up study was performed on 69 patients who received therapeutic conization between 1971 and 1981. Among them one developed stage II cervical cancer two years after the last follow up. Two other patients had recurrent CIN in the cervix and another patient was found to have an endometrial cancer. These patients were successfully treated after early detection of the lesions by the cytological examination. From these facts, cytological examination is recommended in the follow-up after therapeutic conization.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]