These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Energy and nitrogen metabolism of broilers selected over ten generations for increased growth rate, food consumption and conversion of food to gain.
    Author: Pym RA, Nicholls PJ, Thomson E, Choice A, Farrell DJ.
    Journal: Br Poult Sci; 1984 Oct; 25(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 6518406.
    Abstract:
    Energy and nitrogen (N) metabolism were studied in 6-week-old male birds taken from 4 lines of chickens selected for 10 generations for increased weight gain (line W), increased food consumption (line F), increased conversion of food to gain (line E) or at random (controls, line C). Calorimetric measurements were made 8 times on each line while fed ad libitum in large open-circuit respiration chambers for 3 d, and 11 to 13 times without food in smaller closed-circuit respiration chambers for 24 h. The F line ate 60% more food, produced 90% more excreta and 34% more heat and retained 80% more energy and 35% more N in their bodies than lines E and C. Line W was intermediate. When differences in body weight were taken into account, the E and W lines had lower heat production than the C line, while the F line ate 40% more food, produced 30% more heat and retained 70% more energy and 30% more N than the E line. In lines W, F, E and C respectively, the mean metabolisability of dietary energy (%) was 69.4, 62.9, 70.1 and 67.8; the fasting heat production (mean +/- SE) was 481 +/- 9, 569 +/- 10, 485 +/- 9, and 508 +/- 9 kJ/kgW d; the net availability of metabolisable energy (NAME) was 0.68 +/- 0.05, 0.76 +/- 0.04, 0.85 +/- 0.06 and 0.73 +/- 0.04; the estimated daily maintenance energy requirements were 671 +/- 15,866 +/- 14,701 +/- 13, and 742 +/- 11 kJ ME/kgW; and the proportion of N retained per unit increase in N intake was 0.38 +/- 0.08, 0.50 +/- 0.06, 0.56 +/- 0.10 and 0.53 +/- 0.06. The contribution of line differences in the above traits to large line differences in efficiency of food utilisation is discussed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]