These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Processing of binaural stimuli by cat superior olivary complex neurons. Author: Caird D, Klinke R. Journal: Exp Brain Res; 1983; 52(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 6653700. Abstract: A method was developed to record sterotactically from the cat Superior Olivary Complex (SOC) using glass micropipettes. Sound stimulation was given through a closed system that permitted independent variation of interaural time (delta time) and intensity (delta int) differences. The most common binaural units found (n = 34) were ipsilateral excitatory, contralateral inhibitory (EI1), cells of the Lateral Superior Olive (LSO). Some Medial Superior Olive (MSO) cells and presumed MSO ascending afferents were found but, as noted by other authors, we found it difficult to obtain single unit recordings from this nucleus. The LSO EI cells were mostly sensitive to higher frequencies and showed Peristimulus Time Histograms (PSTHs) consisting of a sharp "On" response followed by a plateau when stimulated with Best Frequency (BF) tone bursts or noise bursts. This "On" response was sensitive to delta time and delta int such that ipsilateral time lead or intensity increase resulted in a stronger response. The response reached a minimum around zero delta time or delta int. No sharp peaks or dips were seen in the physiological range needed for localization, instead the response increased with increasing ipsilateral lead or intensity to the maximum values tested (2048 microseconds delta time, 30 dB delta int). In the physiological range the delta time and delta int response were complementary (both increasing response as ipsilaterality was increased). Provided enough sound energy in the unit's sensitive region was present, the same delta time curves were produced when BF tone bursts, masked tone bursts, "sharp onset" tone bursts or noise bursts were used. Changing the delta time of the carrier of the tone burst alone had no effect (except for one cell with a BF of 560 Hz), only the relative time of arrival of the stimulus envelope seemed to be important. In contrast to these LSO EI cells MSO-type units showed EI or EE predominantly low frequency phase-locked responses. When stimulated with interaurally phase shifted (delta pha) BF tones the unit response was a cyclic function of delta pha. Some cells (all that were tested, n = 6 including the 560 Hz LSO EI cell) showed these cyclic responses when stimulated with noise bursts or non-BF tones. However, these "characteristic delays" were not necessarily in the physiological range, i.e. we could find no evidence that these units were responding to delta time/delta pha values corresponding to a particular sound source direction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]