These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Assessment of genotoxic potential of ethylenediamine: in vitro and in vivo studies. Author: Slesinski RS, Guzzie PJ, Hengler WC, Watanabe PG, Woodside MD, Yang RS. Journal: Mutat Res; 1983 Dec; 124(3-4):299-314. PubMed ID: 6656830. Abstract: Ethylenediamine (EDA) was evaluated for potential genotoxic activity using a battery in vitro and in vivo mammalian tests. The tests employed were the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) gene mutation assay, the sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) test with CHO cells, unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assays with primary rat hepatocytes and a dominant lethal study with Fischer 344 rats. EDA did not produce a positive, dose-related, mutagenic effect in either the CHO mutation assay or in the SCE test when evaluated both with and without the addition of a rat-liver S9 activation system. With hepatocytes, no positive effects of EDA upon UDS values were noted in 2 separate studies using either a scintillation counting procedure or an autoradiographic method to determine UDS activity. In a dominant lethal study, male rats fed for 23 weeks with dietary levels of EDA X 2HCl of 0, 0.05, 0.15 or 0.50 g/kg/day, and mated with 1 virgin female/week for 3 consecutive weeks, showed no dose-related or statistically significant effects upon fertility, total number of implantations/female, or the number of living and dead implants per female; marked effects upon the incidence of dominant lethal mutations were noted in the positive control group injected intraperitoneally with one dose of 0.25 mg/kg triethylenemelamine. We conclude that EDA was not genotoxic in the in vitro and in vivo mammalian test systems employed.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]