These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Opioid and dopamine involvement in prolactin release induced by arginine vasotocin and vasopressin in the male rat.
    Author: Blask DE, Vaughan MK, Champney TH, Johnson LY, Vaughan GM, Becker RA, Reiter RJ.
    Journal: Neuroendocrinology; 1984 Jan; 38(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 6694785.
    Abstract:
    The potential involvement of the endogenous opioid and dopamine (DA) systems in the mechanism(s) mediating arginine vasotocin (AVT)- and arginine vasopressin (AVP)-induced prolactin (PRL) release was investigated in vivo. The injection of AVT (5 micrograms) into unanesthetized male rats resulted in a 2-fold stimulation of PRL release 15 min later, followed by an inhibition of PRL release 30 min thereafter; both the stimulatory and inhibitory PRL responses to AVT were obviated by naloxone (NAL) (200 micrograms). Similarly, the administration of either AVT or AVP (5 micrograms) to urethane-anesthetized rats led to a 3- and 5-fold increase in plasma PRL levels, respectively, 10 min after injection. The PRL stimulatory response to both peptides was completely blocked by pretreating the animals with apomorphine (APO) (5 mg); however, the injection of APO by itself had no effect on PRL secretion in these animals. Both AVT and AVP were also effective in stimulating PRL release 10 min after injection in estrogen (50 micrograms)-progesterone (25 mg) (EP)-treated rats anesthetized with urethane. APO negated the PRL stimulatory response to these compounds in the EP-treated rat as well. Normal, urethane-treated rats experienced a 7- to 8-fold increase in PRL levels 20 min following the injection of methysergide (MET) (250 micrograms). Both AVT and AVP caused approximately a 2.5-fold greater PRL response in MET-treated animals than in AVT and AVP controls, respectively; however, only in the MET + AVT-treated rats was the PRL stimulatory response greater than in the MET controls. MET probably stimulated PRL through its DA antagonistic properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]