These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Plethysmographic measurement of lung volume in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Influence of the panting pattern].
    Author: Piquet J, Harf A, Lorino H, Atlan G, Bignon J.
    Journal: Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir; 1984; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 6704562.
    Abstract:
    In 9 healthy subjects and 22 patients with chronic obstructive disease, we computed total lung capacity (TLC) using an integrated flow pressure-corrected body plethysmograph. During panting manoeuvre, TLC derived from oesophageal pressure (TLCes) was compared to TLC derived from mouth pressure (TLCm). In healthy subjects, TLCm was identical to TLCes. Patients with obstructive disease exhibited different behaviours according to experimental conditions: a) in free frequency panting with mouth occlusion close to functional residual capacity (FRC) (9 patients), TLCm appeared to be significantly higher than TLCes (mean difference: 0.25 1; p less than 0.05); b) in panting with both low (less than 1 Hz) and high (2 Hz) frequencies and mouth occlusion close to FRC (7 patients), TLCm appeared to be significantly higher than TLCes only at a high frequency (p less than 0.05); c) in panting with both low and high frequencies and mouth occlusion close to TLC (6 patients), no significant difference was observed between TLCm and TLCes. These results suggest that in patients with chronic obstructive disease plethysmographic lung volume measurements are subject to error, due to the influence of extrathoracic airways. During occlusion at FRC, panting frequency was found to influence the results obtained, the error being minimized with low frequencies. In contrast, by occluding at TLC, we found that panting frequency was less likely to influence the results. However, potential sources of error still exist: for instance, the influence of abdominal gas or the panting pattern.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]