These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Aortic and mitral monovalvular replacements. Comparison of the ball prosthesis of Starr-Edwards (1260-6120) and the tilting disc prosthesis of Bjork-Shiley. Series of 390 patients].
    Author: Monassier JP, Kurtz T, Heitz A, Lachmann P, Kretz JG, Jeanblanc B, Eisenmann B, Kieny R, Kieny MT.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1980 Jan; 73(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 6770788.
    Abstract:
    The evaluation of short and long term replacement by the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis (BS) and by the Starr-Edwards ball and cage prosthesis (SE) was carried out on a series of 390 consecutive patients. In mitral replacement, operative mortality rate (SE 5.9 P. 100 - BS 4.8 P. 100), 5 year actuarial survival (SE 79.8 P. 100 +/- 3.8 P. 100 - BS 86.3 P. 100 +/- 9 p. 100) incidence of thromboembolic complications and valvular thrombosis (SE 1.6 P. 100 - BS 1.3 P. 100) as well as the degree of post-operative improvement were virtually identical in both types of prosthesis. Likewise, in aortic valve replacement, operative mortality rate (SE 4 p. 100 - BS 3.2 p. 100), 5 year survival (SE 82 +/- 7.8 P. 100 - BS 86 +/- 3.3 p. 100) incidence of thromboembolic complications (SE 2.2 p. 100 - BS 1.8 p. 100) and the degree of post-operative improvement were not statistically different. However, the incidence of sudden death was statistically smaller with a BS prosthesis than with a SE prosthesis (respectively 1.6 p. 100 and 6.9 p. 100).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]