These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Value of continuous electrocardiographic recording using the Holter method in the diagnosis and surveillance of myocardial ischemia].
    Author: Fouache Y, Rosier SP, Planeix T, Boisante L, Delescaut MF, Bardet J, Bourdarias JP.
    Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Apr; 74(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 6786240.
    Abstract:
    A series of 80 patients underwent continuous electrocardiography by Holter monitoring (ECG-H) for 24 hours to detect myocardial ischaemia. Fifty five patients were not on anti anginal therapy. The results of ECG-H were compared with those of exercise electrocardiography (ECG-E) (33 cases) and coronary angiography (50 cases). The ECG-H was positive in 31 of 43 patients (72%) with clinical (5 patients) or angiographic (38 patients) signs of ischaemic heart disease. The ECG-H was negative in 11 out of 12 patients (92%) with normal coronary; angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of ECG-H (57% and 92%) were inferior to those of ECG-E (75% and 100%) in the 33 untreated patients undergoing all three investigations. Twenty five recordings were compared with the ECG-E to assess anti anginal therapy. In asymptomatic patients ECG-H showed pathological ST depression in 10 cases, the ECG-E being positive in 1 7 cases. Anginal chest pain was induced on ECG-E in 5 out of 7 cases with a positive ECG-E and negative ECG-H. The lower sensitivity of the ECG-H compared to the ECG-E is related to several factors: 1) the sensitivity of the ECG-E increases with the number of exploratory electrodes; 2) reduced levels of physical activity decrease the sensitivity; in false negative cases the heart rate on ECG-H was only 74 +/- 7% of that corresponding to the threshold of positivity of the ECG-E, compared to 97 +/- 16% of the threshold heart rate in true positives (p less than 0,001); 3) the sensitivity of the ECG-H and ECG-E depends on the severity and distribution of the coronary lesions; false negative results were commoner in single vessel disease (57%) than in double or triple vessel disease (24%) (p less than 0,01). Anginal pain during the test increased the sensitivity to 92%. The specificity of the ECG-H is partially dependent on the recognition of positional variations of the ST segment. These were observed in 10% of cases but were generally easy to distinguish by their beat-to-beat appearances. The satisfactory specificity of the ECG-H in this study is also related to the high incidence of coronary artery disease in the population under study (80%). The predictive value of a positive test (Bayes theorem) was 97%, but that of a negative test was only 41%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]