These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Echocardiographic anomaly of septal contraction after open heart surgery]. Author: Gourdier M, Jouannot P, Hatt PY. Journal: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1982 Jan; 75(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 6803718. Abstract: The function of the interventricular septum (IVS) was studied by M mode echocardiography one month after open-heart surgery in 256 patients with valvular heart disease and without any accepted mechanism of abnormal septal motion. Systolic anterior motion of the IVS was observed in 44% of all the patients and was found to be more common in patients undergoing corrective aortic procedures (64%) than in patients undergoing corrective mitral (36%, p less than 0,01) or mitro-aortic (45% , p less than 0,01) procedures. In technically very adequate studies of 43 patients (33 with systolic anterior motion of the IVS) and 10 normal controls, the following observations were made: - the systolic anterior motion of the IVS was greater after aortic procedures than after mitral ones (-5,64 +/- 1,44 mm, and -2,14 +/- 2,66 mm, p less than 0,005); - patients with systolic anterior motion of the IVS had reduced percentage systolic septal thickening (30,9 +/- 19,0%, p less than 0,02) and normal controls (56,1 +/- 21,0%, p less than 0,005); -the systolic anterior motion of the posterior epicardial echo was more pronounced in post-operative patients, both with abnormal (7,9 +/- 1,8 mm) and normal (7,8+/- 2,2 mm) septal motion, than in normal controls (4,8 +/- 0,7 mm p less than 0,001 and p less than 0,005, respectively); - no other known cause of systolic anterior septal motion were present in the post-operative patients. In conclusion, patients undergoing cardio-pulmonary bypass demonstrated increased systolic anterior motion of the whole heart, which was thought to be related to the partial removal and/or the non-closure of the pericardium. However, this feature was not the only mechanism for the abnormal post-operative motion of the IVS, as reduced contraction of the IVS was always found in these patients. This finding could be ascribed to myocardial per-operative injury, the exact nature of which remains unknown.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]