These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Differentiation between Trypanosoma cruzi and T. rangeli by their different complement sensitivity. Author: Schottelius J. Journal: Tropenmed Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 33(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 6814023. Abstract: Four-day-old culture forms of T. cruzi strains (Col-83, Y, OPS-31, OPS-32, PF, V, P-60), T. cruzi-like strains (WA-301, CL, FL, MR, Castro Alves, Téhuantépéc, P), T. rangeli strain V and T. rangeli-like strain DA 3412 were tested with the following sera: mouse, NMRI-HAN, germ-free; rat, Wistar HAN, germ-free; guinea-pig, PBW:HAN, SPF; normal fresh guinea-pig, hen, rabbit and human sera, heat inactivated guinea-pig serum and normal fresh guinea-pig serum plus EDTA. Incubation of normal fresh guinea-pig, rabbit, rat and human sera lysed the epimastigote forms of T. cruzi and T. cruzi-like strains but not the culture forms of the T. rangeli and T. rangeli-like strains. Mouse serum did not lyse the culture forms of both trypanosome species while the hen serum lysed all culture forms of T. cruzi, T. cruzi-like as well as T. rangeli and T. rangeli-like. Using DEAE 52 cellulose it was possible to separate the metacyclic forms of T. cruzi and T. cruzi-like from the lysed epimastigote stages. A small number of epimastigote forms of T. cruzi and T. cruzi-like are lysis-resistant against normal fresh guinea-pig serum. Fresh normal guinea-pig, rat, rabbit and human sera can be used for the distinction between T. cruzi, T. cruzi-like and T. rangeli, T. rangeli-like.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]