These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
    Author: Rochelson B, Krumholz BA.
    Journal: J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353.
    Abstract:
    One hundred nine of 735 patients (14.8%) referred for colposcopic evaluation had "unsatisfactory" examinations. Of 108 women 40 years of age or over, 81 had unsatisfactory examinations (45%) as compared with 28 of 555 women under 40 (5%) (p less than 0.001). Thirty-five of the 109 patients with unsatisfactory examinations (32%) had had prior cautery or conization as compared with 141 of 626 in the "satisfactory" group (22.5%) (p less than 0.04). Seventy-three of the 99 patients on whom follow-up information was obtained had cervical conization biopsies for final diagnoses. Correlation with previously performed endocervical curettage and colposcopically directed biopsies was poor. Careful correlation of cytology, colposcopy and histopathology is necessary to achieve optimal results in the management of patients with unsatisfactory examinations. Diagnostic conization continues to play an important role in the management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]