These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of prolactin, testosterone and estrogen on prolactin binding in the rat testis, prostate, seminal vesicle and liver.
    Author: Amit T, Barkey RJ, Youdim MB.
    Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol; 1983 May; 30(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 6852362.
    Abstract:
    We have studied the hormonal control of prolactin (PRL) binding in the male rat sex glands and liver, subsequent to the recent demonstration and characterization of specific PRL binding sites in rat testis, prostate and seminal vesicle. Ovine PRL (200 micrograms/rat/day, 7 days) caused a time-dependent reduction in testicular binding of 125I-labelled PRL (measured 2 days after last injection) to 58% of control. Testosterone alone (1 mg/rat/day, 7 days) or PRL caused similar reductions in binding, while their coadministration further lowered PRL binding to 10% of control. The synergism of PRL and testosterone suggests that either these doses are submaximal, or that they are acting on different systems. Estradiol was administered as a single dose of 2 mg/rat and the PRL binding determined on day 10 and day 19 was reduced to 37% of control, as after testosterone. Addition of PRL whether from day 1 to day 7 or from day 11 to day 17 of estradiol injection had no effect, suggesting that the EB site of action is closer to the PRL receptor than that for PRL or testosterone. Estradiol resulted in a 72% reduction of PRL binding in the prostate, after 10 days, which subsequent PRL completely restored. PRL also partially restored the estradiol-induced time-dependent weight reduction of the prostate, but PRL coadministered from day 1 of estradiol did not inhibit the estradiol effects, suggesting a competitive mechanism for the two. While testosterone more than doubled PRL binding in the seminal vesicle, estradiol reduced it by 32% and organ weight by 21%. PRL given after estradiol restored the weight loss, but not the binding, suggesting that two different mechanisms of action are involved. In the liver, coadministration of testosterone with PRL could not inhibit the induction by PRL of its own hepatic sites, in keeping with a more direct site of action for PRL than for testosterone. These results demonstrate the profound effects of PRL, and of the sex steroids testosterone and estrogen, on PRL binding in the male sex glands and liver. The physiological implication of these findings on the role of PRL in male sexual function is currently being investigated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]