These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The pill: an evaluation of recent studies.
    Author: Rosenfield A.
    Journal: Johns Hopkins Med J; 1982 May; 150(5):177-80. PubMed ID: 7043036.
    Abstract:
    The present level of understanding of the known risks of oral contraceptive (OC) use are summarized. The findings of many investigations in the late 1960s and early 1970s may no longer be totally appropriate because OCs available then had higher dosages than today. Also, early studies enrolled predominantly women in their 20s, who are now almost all more than 35 years old. Thus, the risks observed in these studies may not be applicable to younger women using OCs today. Another consideration has been underscored by the results of the Walnut Creek Study. Behavioral characteristics such as smoking, drinking, and sexual activity are factors which can strongly confound risks of OC use and must be considered when assessing current and future investigations. Many studies have clearly shown that the most serious life threatening danger associated with OC use is that of cardiovascular complications arising from the interaction of OC use and smoking. The increased risks attributable to smoking while using OCs account for a substantial number of the deaths recorded. The Walnut Creek Study showed a somewhat different outcome. Its data suggest no significant risk of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic heart disease, cerebral thrombosis, or ischemic cerebrovascular disease associated with OC use, but there were nonsignificant increases noted in some cardiovascular diseases which appeared to be explained by a synergism between current use and heavy smoking. Age also has a strong influence on risk for cardiovascular disease. The results of earlier studies seem to indicate that OC use is associated with a risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. The Walnut Creek Study also noted an increased risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with OC use and found that risk increased with use. Several studies have shown that the incidence of venous thrombosis seems dependent on the dosage of the OC used. An overwhelming majority of studies on the carcinogenicity of OCs have found no increased incidence of cancer of the ovaries, uterus, or breast among users. In regard to both ovaries and endometrium, there is some evidence that OCs may be protective. Several studies have concluded that OC users have a slightly increased risk of developing malignant melanoma. The results of the Oxford/Family Planning Study show that although previous use of OC by nulliparous women may delay future childbearing by several months, it does not impair longterm potential for pregnancy. No increase in risk of clinically apparent diabetes mellitus has been reported in users. In addition to their possible protection against ovarian and endometrial cancer, OCs may reduce the risk of at least 5 other diseases: benign breast disease; deficiency anemia; arthritis, pelvic inflammatory disease; and ovarian cysts.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]