These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Immunoinhibition and automated column chromatography compared for assay of creatine kinase isoenzyme MB in serum.
    Author: Bayer PM, Boehm M, Hajdusich P, Hotschek H, Koehn H, Unger W, Wider G.
    Journal: Clin Chem; 1982 Jan; 28(1):166-9. PubMed ID: 7055904.
    Abstract:
    We examined sera from six different groups of patients for CK-MB activity by means of two commercially available tests, an immunoinhibition method (E. Merck) and the CK-MB test as used with the aca (Du Pont). In the first group of patients (suspicion of myocardial infarction) the correlation between the two methods was good: r = 0.9191, y = 1.068x -- 0.888, x = 18.7 U/L, y = 19.0 U/L. In the second group, patients with high adenylate kinase activity, no interference was detectable on the aca, whereas the immunoinhibition method yielded falsely high CK-MB values. The third group consisted of persons with macro-CK-BB in their serum. In the immunoinhibition test these patients usually showed a high CK-MB:total CK ratio, whereas such results were rarely found for the aca. The fourth group, patients with a different electrophoretic mobility of their CK-isoenzymes (migration of an active band towards the cathode), were detected by the immunoinhibition method (high ratio of CK-MB to total CK), but not with the aca. In the presence of free CK-BB (group five) the immunoinhibition test resulted in "falsely" high CK-MB values, whereas CK-BB was retained on the column of the aca. In skeletal muscle diseases (group six) results by the two methods differed, values for CK-MB on the aca being much higher. It was demonstrated experimentally that this was due to CK-MM with altered surface charge.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]