These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biological comparisons between a laboratory-maintained and a recently isolated field strain of Boophilus microplus.
    Author: Stewart NP, Callow LL, Duncalfe F.
    Journal: J Parasitol; 1982 Aug; 68(4):691-4. PubMed ID: 7119993.
    Abstract:
    Biological differences between two strains of Boophilus microplus were examined. The A-strain of ticks had been maintained at the laboratory for many years and the N-strain was recently isolated, being a composite strain derived from ticks from different sources in the field. In three experiments, up to three times as many N-strain ticks grew to maturity than did A-strain ticks, although A-strain ticks matured earlier. N-strain ticks were 17 to 60% heavier, and laid 50 to 100% more eggs than A-strain ticks. N-strain eggs were significantly more fertile than A-strain eggs. Unfed, N-strain larvae survived much longer than A-strain larvae. The reduced vitality of the A-strain is attributed to its long history in the laboratory during which time it has become biologically disadvantaged through inbreeding. These results suggest that some laboratory-maintained strains of ticks may be unsuitable for ecological or acaricide studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]