These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of N,N-dimethyldodecanamine with antibiotics on in vitro cellulose digestion and volatile fatty acid production by ruminal microorganisms.
    Author: Baldwin KA, Bitman J, Thompson MJ.
    Journal: J Anim Sci; 1982 Sep; 55(3):673-9. PubMed ID: 7130069.
    Abstract:
    Eleven antibiotic compounds used in animal production, were compared with N,N-dimethyldodecanamine for their effects on in vitro cellulose digestibility and VFA production. Dose-response data were analyzed statistically to determine the concentration for each compound which would inhibit cellulose digestion of VFA production by 50%, thereby providing a convenient reference point for evaluation of the amine with respect to the antibiotics. Chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline and penicillin inhibited cellulose digestion by 17 to 35% and VFA production by 18 to 26% at concentrations of 2.5 micrograms/ml, while N,N-dimethyldodecanamine and dihydrostreptomycin at concentrations of 10 micrograms/ml inhibited cellulose digestion and VFA production by 5 to 19%. For similar inhibitive effects, bacitracin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, sulfanilamide and sulfathiazole were required in concentrations of 25 micrograms/ml. Tylosin at a concentration of 1 microgram/ml inhibited cellulose digestion and VFA production by about 80 and 50%, respectively, and monensin was effective at 5 micrograms/ml. In general, compounds of lesser importance for growth promotion in ruminants (sulfathiazole, sulfanilamide and kanamycin) had a less inhibitory effect on cellular digestion and VFA production in vitro. N,N-dimethyldodecanamine was more effective than these compounds but repressed cellulolytic activity less than those antibiotics (chlortetracycline, oxytetraxycline and monensin) that are most effective in improving feed efficiency.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]