These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Clinical evaluation and follow-up on 3,829 IUD procedures. Author: Hindle WH. Journal: Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1978; 45():105-10. PubMed ID: 715859. Abstract: The experience of a group practice from January 1972 through December 1976 with IUDs (the Copper 7, Copper T, Dalkon Shield, Gynecoli, Lippes loop, Saf-T-Coil, and Ypsilon Y) is summarized and clinical impressions are drawn. Tables present the following data for each type of IUD (all broken down by parous vs. nulliparous women): insertion, removal, complete and incomplete expulsion, pregnancy, removal for medical reasons, removal for elective reasons, perforations, and pelvic infections. The Ypsilon Y appeared to have an undesirable number of pregnancies and removals for medical reasons. The Copper 7 appeared to have a much higher acceptance, particularly in nulliparous women. Discussion raised the points that (1) the experience of several clinics would be necessary for valid comparison; (2) copper IUDs apparently had low infection rates; (3) serum iron level and hemoglobin should be measured before and regularly during IUD use; (4) IUDs should not be inserted within 3 months of pregnancy, term or aborted.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]