These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Volumetric correction of the maximal expiratory flow 25-75% in chronic obstructive bronchopneumopathies]. Author: Dull WL, Alexander MR, Kasik JE. Journal: Rev Fr Mal Respir; 1982; 10(5):337-44. PubMed ID: 7178638. Abstract: After inhalation of a bronchodilator aerosol, indices of airway obstruction usually improve whereas the forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% (FEF25-75%) of the forced vital capacity (FVC) commonly remains the same or may decrease. This is due to the fact that the FEF25-75% after bronchodilatation is measured at lower absolute lung volumes with subsequently less elastic recoil pressure. A goal of this study was to analyze this test after volume adjusting so that the flows before and after a bronchodilator are compared at equal volumes (isovolume). Thirty-seven men with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) performed maximal forced expiratory maneuvers before and 15 minutes after isoproterenol (0.15 mg) inhalation. The mean value of isovolume (0.56 +/- .30 1. sec-1) was significantly greater (p less than 0.001) than the FEF25-75% recorded before (0.45 +/- .26 1. sec-1) and after (0.50 +/- .27 1. sec-1, p less than 0.01) bronchodilator inhalation. The FVC was improved in 18 patients but only 6 (33%) had an improved conventional FEF25-75%. On the other hand, isovolume FEF improved in 12 (66%) patients. Isovolume FEF also improved twice as frequently as conventional FEF25-75% in those demonstrating an improvement in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1). Furthermore, when the conventional FEF25-75% demonstrated no improvement after isoproterenol inhalation, isovolume improved in 8/26 (31%) of these patients. Our results suggest that volume adjusting the FEF25-75% after isoproterenol inhalation increases its sensitivity for detecting acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD, and that this methods appears practical in routine pulmonary function testing.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]