These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Problems of assessment and occupational rehabilitation of patients with malignant urogenital neoplasm].
    Author: Hoffmann L, Polak HJ, Hudemann B, Serfling D, Riedel H.
    Journal: Z Urol Nephrol; 1981 Jan; 74(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 7195124.
    Abstract:
    The expert opinion and the rehabilitation of patients with urogenital tumours often render great problems and tasks for the urologist. A schematic invalidisation of these patients is to be refused. The leading idea of an expert opinion should be the rehabilitation. This demands from the expert a judgment of the function with evaluation of the oncological prognosis quoad vitam and a judgment of the remaining functions of the treated organism as well as a recommendation for the further professional activity based on this judgment. A close cooperation with industrial institutions, the factory public health, the medical advisory commissions and the rehabilitation commissions is necessary for rehabilitation. The notion of rehabilitation--professional as well as social--is to be extended to the not unconsiderable number of patients at pensioner's age. The resumption of a suitable work effects in a patient sith successfully treated tumour disease the improvement of the general physico-psychic resistance, increases the will to recovery and activity and furthers the acclimatization and adaptation to remaining disturbances. Thus expert opinion in the sense of rehabilitation is also a therapy. The results of modern tumour therapy should not be measured only at the survival rates, but also at the degree of the social and professional rehabilitation of the patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]