These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of heart rate on systolic time intervals: effects of atrial pacing versus dynamic exercise.
    Author: Mertens HM, Mannebach H, Trieb G, Gleichmann U.
    Journal: Clin Cardiol; 1981 Jan; 4(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 7226587.
    Abstract:
    The effects of atrial pacing and dynamic exercise in the supine position on systolic time intervals (STI) were compared in 10 normals. In another group of 13 normals, the effect of exercise alone on STI was tested. A linear shortening of electromechanical systole (QS2) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) with increasing heart rate was demonstrated with right atrial pacing and dynamic exercise in the frequency range between 60 and 140 beats/min. However, the shortening of LVET was significantly less (p less than 0.01) with exercise compared to pacing. This is explained by an increase in left ventricular stroke volume with exercise. The preejection period (PEP) was significantly (p less than 0.001) shortened with exercise, but there was no change with atrial pacing. Thus, changes in heart rate (HR) alone, without changes in the dynamic state of the heart, did not influence PEP. It is suggested that PEP at rest should not be corrected for heart rate. The supine exercise regression equations for correction of heart rate for LVET and PEP differ from both the resting and the upright exercise regression equations. With exercise a frequency correction of STI using regression equations should be abandoned. Instead, uncorrected STI at standard heart rates (e.g., 100, 110, and 130 beats/min) should be taken for comparison. Heart rate standardization should be employed using the formula: Formula (See Text).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]