These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cardiac rehabilitation: evaluation and intervention less than 6 weeks after myocardial infarction.
    Author: Harrington KA, Smith KH, Schumacher M, Lunsford BR, Watson KL, Selvester RH.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1981 Apr; 62(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 7235903.
    Abstract:
    Twenty-nine patients having myocardial infarction (MI) of recent origin (6 weeks or less) were evaluated and treated using a program in which assessment and progression were based not on generalized data but on the individual responses of each patient. Fourteen patients had complications including left ventricular impairment, continuing ischemia or rhythm disturbances, and 15 did not. Cardiac tolerance for the common self-care activities, walking and light exercise, was objectively defined by 3 levels of functional monitoring. The physician, occupational therapist and physical therapist evaluated the patient's responses to mild exertion, utilizing a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ecg), physical examination, 24-hour monitoring with a portable ecg, self-care evaluation and a modified treadmill screening test. Patient performance was assessed at each stage of testing and individualized activity levels were determined in accordance with cardiac responses. Thus patients progressed at their optimum rate with safety and without loss of time, ie, artificially induced invalidism. Following the 1st self-care evaluation, 3 patients were ordered to bedrest for further medical treatment while 26 were cleared for ward activity. When their conditions improved the 3 patients were reevaluated and began the program. The 15 patients without complications had appropriate responses to activity and proceeded to a mild exercise program with minimal observation. Of the 14 with complications, 5 experienced a temporary program interruption and 2 were dropped from the program secondary to severity of complications. The remaining 7 were progressed in the same manner as those without complication.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]