These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
    Author: Levine FH, Carter JE, Buckley MJ, Daggett WM, Akins CW, Austen WG.
    Journal: Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322.
    Abstract:
    The Hancock (H) and Carpentier-Edwards (CE) porcine xenografts are the most commonly used bioprostheses hemodynamic performance of these valves at each valve size was assessed by intraoperative measurement of transvalvular gradients and cardiac outputs in 122 patients undergoing aortic or mitral valve replacement. At comparable cardiac outputs, peak aortic valve gradients (+/- DS) were: 23-mm valve - H (modified orifice) 10.8 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, CE 7.6 +/- 6.2 mm Hg; 25-mm valve - H 11.9 +/- 5.5 mm Hg, CE 8.3 +/- 5.9 mm Hg; 27/29-mm valve - H 11.0 +/- 6.0 mm Hg, CE 6.6 +/- 5.0 mm Hg. Mitral valve gradients were: 29-mm valve - H 3.7 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, CE 2.8 +/- 1.1 mm Hg; 31-mm valve - H 3.5 +/- 1.0 mm Hg, CE 2.6 +/- 0.7 mm Hg, 33/35-mm valve - H 3.2 +/- 1.9 mm Hg. In both the mitral and aortic positions, Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses had significantly lower (p less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively) transvalvular gradients than Hancock porcine xenografts.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]