These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Functional characteristics of cochlear nucleus in behaving cat examined by acoustic masking of electrical stimuli.
    Author: Frederickson CJ, Gerken GM.
    Journal: J Neurophysiol; 1978 Nov; 41(6):1535-45. PubMed ID: 731289.
    Abstract:
    1. Cats were trained, using an operant procedure, to detect and respond to electrical stimulation delivered in the vicinity of the cochlear nucleus. The electrical stimuli were presented both in silence and in synchrony with repeated noise bursts to determine whether detection thresholds for the electrical stimuli were elevated by the acoustic masking noise. 2. For stimulation sites centered within auditory structures (cochlear nucleus or acoustic nerve root), the acoustic maskers caused a consistent elevation of the electrical detection thresholds. For stimulation sites that were in or bordered on nonacoustic neural structures (e.g., vestibular), the acoustic maskers caused little or no elevation of electrical detection thresholds. 3. The magnitude of the acoustic masking effect was monotonically related to the intensity of the acoustic masker across the range of intensities tested. 4. The magnitude of the masking effect was strongly dependent on the relative timing of the stimulus pulse and the masker noise burst. Maximum masking occurred when the pulse just followed the onset of the neural activity in cochlear nucleus evoked by the masker burst. Less masking occurred when the electrical pulse occurred at the middle or end of the masker burst, and still less when the pulse occurred just prior to the onset (backward masking) or just after the offset (forward masking) of the masker burst. 5. The magnitude of the masking effect also depended on the frequency of the acoustic masker. For tone bursts, masking was maximal for each electrode at a particular frequency and declined monotonically for masker frequencies above or below the optimal frequency. 6. It is concluded that the masking of an electrical stimulus by an acoustic stimulus depends on a direct interaction between the neural responses evoked by the two stimuli, and that similar central, neural interactions may contribute to acoustic masking of acoustic stimuli. It is also concluded that the technique of masking an electrical stimulus by an acoustical stimulus is a precise and useful tool for the study of sensory-neural organization in intact behaving animals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]