These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Comparative study of five different methods for measuring urinary porphyrins (author's transl)]. Author: Usuelli G, Piccinini S, Alessi E, Basagni M. Journal: Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1978 Mar; 14(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 746113. Abstract: The AA. have compared five different methods for measuring urinary porphyrins (Bio-Rad porphyrins, Porphyrin-T Sibar, Reinkingh-Van Kampen, Schwartz and coll., Fischer-Ham). Based on the results obtained, for total porphyrins the best method appeared to be the Porphyrin-T Sibar test, while for the separate evaluation of uro- and coproporphyrins the most suitable method proved to be the one proposed by Reinkingh-Van Kampen. The investigations has also allowed the AA. to conclude that spectrophotometric reading can replace the fluorimetric one, without affecting the accuracy of results.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]