These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Author: Keane MW, Horger EO, Vice L. Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146. Abstract: During an 18-month period 1328 nonstress tests (NST) and sequential contraction stress tests (CST) were performed on 566 patients. The criterion for reactivity was at least 2 accelerations associated with fetal movement during 20 minutes. The last test performed within 1 week of delivery was compared with perinatal outcome. A total of 1118 (84.2%) NSTs were reactive, and 210 (15.8%) were nonreactive. Of the CSTs 1249 (94.1%) were negative, 52 (3.9%) were positive, 16 (1.2%) were equivocal, and 11 (0.8%) were unsatisfactory. The correlation between a reactive NST and a negative CST was excellent (99.4%), whereas that between a nonreactive NST and a positive CST was poor (24.8%). Although the CST proved to be a better predictor of morbidity than the NST, both tests are highly significant predictors (P less than .001). Fetuses exhibiting both a nonreactive NST and a negative sequential CST are at no increased risk for morbidity. This study supports the concept that a precisely defined NST is an adequate screening tool for the evaluation of high-risk pregnancies.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]