These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Femoropopliteal bypass to the isolated popliteal segment: is polytetrafluoroethylene graft acceptable? Author: Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Daly VD. Journal: Surgery; 1981 Mar; 89(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 7466617. Abstract: In a series of 148 polytetrafluoroethylene femoropopliteal bypasses performed for limb salvage, 33-month life-table cumulative patency rates for grafts inserted into an isolated popliteal artery segment (91% +/- 5%) were not significantly different from those inserted into a popliteal segment with angiographically better runoff (78% +/- 5%). Similarly, below-knee reconstructions had 3-year patency rates (86% +/- 6%) that were not significantly different from those for bypasses inserted into the popliteal artery above the knee (79% +/- 6%). One clear disadvantage of the isolated popliteal artery segment as a site for distal insertion of the bypass was the increased incidence of limb loss despite a patent reconstruction. This was particularly frequent in diabetics with extensive foot gangrene or infection and could be avoided by a secondary extension of the bypass to a patent distal leg or foot artery.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]