These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Author: Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.
    Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: A new digital thoracic radiography system (Thoravision; Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany), which uses selenium as a detector material, was evaluated for observer preference. The system has been shown to have higher detection efficiency than conventional film-screen systems and thus could provide an image with reduced noise. The hypothesis tested in this study was that the selenium-based digital system would provide an image appearance for conventional thoracic imaging that would be equal or superior to that provided by a conventional film-screen system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patient volunteers were imaged at 120 kV with both the selenium-based system and a thoracic film-screen combination system (InSight HC; Kodak, Rochester, NY). Posteroanterior and lateral images were acquired with both systems, for a total of 212 images. Both imaging systems included a stationary 12:1 antiscatter grid. Exposures were the same for both imaging systems, and the digital images were printed to film. Images for the same patient were compared by six observers--three specialized chest radiologists and three general radiologists. Images included both normal chest radiographs and radiographs with abnormal findings. Each pair of images was ranked on a scale from 1 to 5 for preference of technique, with a score of 3 indicating no preference. Eleven anatomic features were evaluated in the posteroanterior views, and six features were evaluated in the lateral views. Statistical significance of preference was evaluated with Student's t test. RESULTS: The chest radiologists had a statistically significant preference for the selenium-based system for all 17 features (p < .001). The general radiologists had a statistically significant preference for the selenium-based system for visualization of 10 of the 17 features (p < .05). Neither group had a statistically significant preference for the conventional images in any category. CONCLUSION: The selenium-based system provided an image appearance that was significantly preferred by all radiologists, more strongly by those specializing in chest radiography. This study demonstrates that a digital thoracic imaging system can routinely produce images that are perceived as equal or superior to conventional images.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]